20 research outputs found

    Automatic configuration of NSGA-II with jMetal and irace

    Get PDF
    jMetal is a Java-based framework for multi-objective optimization with metaheuristics providing, among other features, a wide set of algorithms that are representative of the state-of-the-art. Although it has become a widely used tool in the area, it lacks support for automatic tuning of algorithm parameter settings, which can prevent obtaining accurate Pareto front approximations, especially for inexperienced users. In this paper, we present a first approach to combine jMetal and irace, a package for automatic algorithm configuration; the NSGA-II is chosen as the target algorithm to be tuned. The goal is to facilitate the combined use of both tools to jMetal users to avoid wasting time in adjusting manually the parameters of the algorithms. Our proposal involves the definition of a new algorithm template for evolutionary algorithms, which allows the flexible composition of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms from a set of configurable components, as well as the generation of configuration files for adjusting the algorithm parameters with irace. To validate our approach, NSGA-II is tuned with a benchmark problems and compared with the same algorithm using standard settings, resulting in a new variant that shows a competitive behavior.Universidad de Málaga. Campus de Excelencia Internacional Andalucía Tech

    PSA based multi objective evolutionary algorithms

    Get PDF
    It has generally been acknowledged that both proximity to the Pareto front and a certain diversity along the front, should be targeted when using evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Recently, a new partitioning mechanism, the Part and Select Algorithm (PSA), has been introduced. It was shown that this partitioning allows for the selection of a well-diversified set out of an arbitrary given set, while maintaining low computational cost. When embedded into an evolutionary search (NSGA-II), the PSA has significantly enhanced the exploitation of diversity. In this paper, the ability of the PSA to enhance evolutionary multiobjective algorithms (EMOAs) is further investigated. Two research directions are explored here. The first one deals with the integration of the PSA within an EMOA with a novel strategy. Contrary to most EMOAs, that give a higher priority to proximity over diversity, this new strategy promotes the balance between the two. The suggested algorithm allows some dominated solutions to survive, if they contribute to diversity. It is shown that such an approach substantially reduces the risk of the algorithm to fail in finding the Pareto front. The second research direction explores the use of the PSA as an archiving selection mechanism, to improve the averaged Hausdorff distance obtained by existing EMOAs. It is shown that the integration of the PSA into NSGA-II-I and Δ p -EMOA as an archiving mechanism leads to algorithms that are superior to base EMOAS on problems with disconnected Pareto fronts. © 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

    An Empirical Comparison of Several Recent Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms

    No full text
    Part 2: Optimization-Genetic AlgorithmsInternational audienceMany real-world problems can be formulated as multi-objective optimisation problems, in which many potentially conflicting objectives need to be optimized simultaneously. Multi-objective optimisation algorithms based on Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) such as Genetic Algorithms (GAs) have been proven to be superior to other traditional algorithms such as goal programming. In the past years, several novel Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) have been proposed. Rather than based on traditional GAs, these algorithms extended other EAs including novel EAs such as Scatter Search and Particle Swarm Optimiser to handle multi-objective problems. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no fair and systematic comparison of these novel MOEAs. This paper, for the first time, presents the results of an exhaustive performance comparison of an assortment of 5 new and popular algorithms on the DTLZ benchmark functions using a set of well-known performance measures. We also propose a novel performance measure called unique hypervolume, which measures the volume of objective space dominated only by one or more solutions, with respect to a set of solutions. Based on our results, we obtain some important observations on how to choose an appropriate MOA according to the preferences of the user

    Producing Just Enough Documentation: The Next SAD Version Problem

    No full text
    Software architecture knowledge is an important asset in today´s projects, as it serves to share the main design decisions among the project stakeholders. Architectural knowledge is commonly captured by the Software Architecture Document (SAD), an artifact that is useful but can also be costly to produce and maintain. In practice, the SAD often fails to fulll its mission of addressing the stakeholders´ information needs, due to factors such as: detailed or high-level contents that do not consider all stakeholders, outdated documentation, or documentation generated late in the lifecycle, among others. To alleviate this problem, we propose a documentation strategy that seeks to balance the stakeholders´ interests in the SAD against the efforts of producing it. Our strategy is cast as an optimization problem called "the next SAD version problem (NSVP) and several search-based techniques for it are discussed. A preliminary evaluation of our approach has shown its potential for exploring cost-benefit tradeoffs in documentation production.Fil: Diaz Pace, Jorge Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tandil. Instituto Superior de Ingenieria del Software; ArgentinaFil: Nicoletti, Matías Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tandil. Instituto Superior de Ingenieria del Software; ArgentinaFil: Schiaffino, Silvia Noemi. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tandil. Instituto Superior de Ingenieria del Software; ArgentinaFil: Vidal, Santiago Agustín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Tandil. Instituto Superior de Ingenieria del Software; Argentin
    corecore